Download Glucofacts Software For Mac. Best Word To Pdf Converter Software For Mac Free Download. Download Mac Operating System To Flash Drive. Hp Officejet 4635 Software Mac Free Download. Adobe Illustrator Free Mac Download.If postponing Snow Leopard is out-of-bounds, then IApple could have posted a security advisory.Is it possible in the run-up to going GM that a serious issue could be discovered that would warrant postponing the release of a major OS update? Sure. He has the gall to ask those of us whoBut what exactly should Apple have done differently?Gruber apparently considers the possibility of postponing theRelease of Snow Leopard in order to coordinate with Adobe to beUnreasonable. Jeffrey Czerniak answers my “What should Apple have done differently?” question:John Gruber’s latest piece of Apple apologetics concerns the factThat Apple shipped a known-vulnerable version of Adobe Flash PlayerOn the Snow Leopard DVD. PTThe only mention from Adobe regarding Snow Leopard’s version of Flash is this post on the Adobe Flash Platform Blog by Tom Barclay, which reads in its entirety: The initial release of Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) includes an earlier version of Adobe Flash Player than what is available from Adobe.com.( 9:30pm ET: See updates one and two, inline below.)While the Mac OS X v10.6.4 update does not appear to downgrade users who have already upgraded to Adobe Flash Player 10.1, Adobe recommends users verify they are using the latest, most secure. Canon Image Class Mf216n Software Download For Mac.More on the Snow Leopard/Old Version of Flash Brouhaha Saturday, 5 September 2009The Flash Player is automatically downgraded when Mac OS X Snow Leopard is installed-a move one security expert said needs to be addressed immediately.
Adobe Flash Snow Leopard Free Mac Download(Forgive him for his brevity, given the constraints of Twitter.)I have no sympathy for the argument that Apple should have included an eight-day-old version of Flash in the Snow Leopard installer, or that they should have delayed the release of Snow Leopard to include it. — argues that the problem is specifically the issue of the installer downgrading the version of Flash for users who manually upgraded to the latest version of Flash while they were on 10.5. Why Doesn’t the Snow Leopard Installer Do the Right Thing if You’ve Already Installed the Latest Version of Flash?Mike Ash — on Twitter here, here, here, and etc. A bill ofMaterials, bom, contains all the files within a directory, alongWith some information about each file. From the bom man page:The Mac OS X Installer uses a file system “bill of materials” toDetermine which files to install, remove, or upgrade. The Mac OS X Installer system relies on “bill of materials” bom files. Perhaps the bom file left by Adobe’s Flash installer is malformed. I do not know why it doesn’t work this way. Also included are a checksum ofEach file and information about hard links.The bill of materials for installed packages are found within thePackage receipts located in /Library/Receipts.In theory, the Snow Leopard installer could look at the bom for Flash and, if the installed version is greater than the version in the installer, leave it. Lundell’s personally updated version of Python 2.6.2 was, and remains, in /usr/local/bin/. DF reader Jonathan Lundell emailed me to report that he had in fact upgraded his system version of Python to version 2.6.2 while on Mac OS X 10.5.8, and, after upgrading to Snow Leopard, he still had version 2.6.2 installed, not the Snow Leopard default version 2.6.1.Update 1: Correction, ends up I was right in the first place. Like, say, if you overwrote theSystem version of Python with version 2.6.2 — when you upgrade toSnow Leopard, the installer will give you the system standardEnds up I chose a bad example, because this is not true. The same is true for anyComponent you manually upgrade. (Flash, and all other default items in the /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/ folder, are part of the Essentials package.)Yesterday, as a hypothetical example, I wrote:That’s just how the installer works. Some people may reasonably argue that they’d prefer a broken version of Flash than a potentially vulnerable version, but the point of the components in the Essentials package is that Apple deems them, well, essential. What if the very latest version of Flash worked just fine on Leopard but did not work on Snow Leopard? That is apparently not the case, but, what if it were? (And don’t tell me it’s not possible.) In that case, if the OS installer worked as Ash and others desire, after upgrading to Snow Leopard you’d have a system where Flash did not work at all. The confusion arose because he checked the version by typing just “ python -V”, rather than specifying the full path to /usr/bin/python at the command prompt.(As for why the Mac OS X Installer might be designed to overwrite components like Flash in this regard, consider the following hypothetical. Best phone emulator for mac10.0.22.87 — The version of Flash Adobe identifies as having “critical vulnerabilities”. 10.0.23.1 — The version that ships with Snow Leopard 10.6.0. 10.0.32.18 — The current version of Flash 10 from Adobe. There are three versions of Flash to keep in mind: Why Flash is deemed essential is a good question, though.) Which Vulnerabilities Apply to Flash Version 10.0.23.1?Lastly, I’ve been attempting to research exactly what the vulnerabilities are in Snow Leopard 10.6.0’s version of Flash, but have come up empty. Quicken for mac cheapThis vulnerability (CVE-2009-1862) couldCause a crash and potentially allow an attacker to take control ofThe affected system. The other two apply to Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.Advisory APSA09-03, dated 22 July 2009, states:A critical vulnerability exists in the current versions of FlashPlayer (v9.0.159.0 and v10.0.22.87) for Windows, Macintosh, LinuxAnd Solaris operating systems, and the authplay.dll component thatShips with Adobe Reader and Acrobat v9.x for Windows, Macintosh andUNIX operating systems. One of the advisories from July is specific to Windows Internet Explorer. One dates back to February and is no longer relevant the other three were from late July. It could be that 10.0.23.1 has all, some, or none of the vulnerabilities in version 10.0.22.87. But neither mention version 10.0.23.1 at all.Is version 10.0.23.1 susceptible to the same “critical vulnerabilities” as version 10.0.22.87? I can’t find any version information about Flash 10.0.23.1 whatsoever. So both of these bulletins mention version 10.0.22.87 as being vulnerable and recommend updating to version 10.0.32.18. TheseVulnerabilities could cause the application to crash and couldPotentially allow an attacker to take control of the affectedAdobe recommends users of Adobe Flash Player 9.x and 10.x andEarlier versions update to Adobe Flash Player 9.0.246.0 andIn both advisories, the “affected software versions” are listed as “Adobe Flash Player 9.0.159.0 and 10.0.22.87 and earlier 9.x and 10.x versions”. We recommend all users update to the latest, most secureVersion of Flash Player (10.0.32.18) — which supports Snow LeopardSo, yes, Adobe clearly recommends upgrading to 10.0.32.18, but doesn’t mention any specific problems with 10.0.23.1.Update 2: Via Twitter, Dj Walker-Morgan reports that version 10.0.23.1 is the same version of Flash from the June WWDC seed of Snow Leopard, so it almost certainly doesn’t contain the fixes for the issues Adobe publicized in July.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMarcelle ArchivesCategories |